I guess the once-a-week thing isn't working for me. It's funny, given my inclination to routine and schedule...but I suppose the inspiration to write happens when it happens.
__________________________________________________________
Usually, when it comes to the meaning of words, I stand on those who came before me. Bible, concordance, dictionary, church tradition, and such like. Sometimes these sources differ. It is in those moments, and many others like them, that I am reminded of the unavoidability (is that a word?) of hierarchy (a subject for another day). Which source rules?
Anyway, the word this post is questioning is on my mind regularly. Many folks throw it around with seeming careless abandon, all willy-nilly. It would appear that most of the people I see tossing it around mean something very simple by it - something like "professes to believe in Jesus Christ", or perhaps "remotely associated with, at least tangentially" the same Person.
Of course, many no doubt mean, very sincerely, that they (at least attempt to) follow the teachings of Jesus Christ, as revealed in scripture. Still others use it as a sort of short-hand way to signal the "safe-ness" of a particular thing or class of things, like for instance "Christian" comedy, or music, etc. It is also used, ever more of late, to refer to a particular culture - itself a word in desperate need of defining.
Are any of those the correct definition? Are all of them? Words often come, over time, to have many different - sometimes even contradictory - meanings. Language is, after all, at best among us fallen humans, a propositional thing. I frequently think that it is a miracle that we can even approximately communicate meanings to each other, at all - no less a miracle than Balaam's ass speaking.
I look, first, to the bible for guidance, if available, in all matters. So, what does it say?
Acts 11:26 | ...And the disciples were called Christians first in Antioch.
You'll notice that it doesn't say "they called themselves", or that they "called really good things", by that Name. It at least seems to indicate that something in their behavior led others to refer to them using that Word. As another verse tells us:
Exo. 20:7 | Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.
In fact, in the church tradition to which I belong, we attach so much meaning to this Word that we seldom use it to refer to anything in this world, much less our very own sinful selves. As near as I can tell, we hold to a definition of "to behave like unto" the One whose Name that is. And, since few truly humble saints would ever be so prideful as to claim their sinful self to be remotely on par with the blessed Savior...well, as I said, we seldom use it and never about self - but rather, perhaps, in reference to another.
We might think so highly of a dear brother- or sister-in-Christ, and their demonstrated devotion to His teachings, that we can claim with all sincerity, that if anyone evidences the love of God manifest in their lives, such a one does.
Please note, I am not assuming ill-intent if you use this name in ways different from me. I merely assume most of the time you must mean one of the other, less solemn, less holy and sanctified definitions, and I try to humbly and charitably understand what you might actually mean.
But, now, you know what I mean by the word - the heavy weight attached to it in my mind - and why I don't toss it around so lightly.